this page
- title ............
- MVP Development Companies in Central & Eastern Europe | Easify Technologies
- human_version ....
- easifytechnologies.com/mvp-development-companies-central-eastern-europe/
- raw_markdown .....
- /mvp-development-companies-central-eastern-europe.md
for agents
- /llms.txt ................
- a short index of the site for language models
- /{page}.md ...............
- any page as markdown, e.g. /pricing.md or /index.md
- Accept: text/markdown ....
- request any page with this header and you get its markdown
- /machine/{page}/ .........
- this view: the same markdown, readable in a browser
content
14 MVP development companies in Poland, Hungary, Estonia, Austria, Bulgaria, Romania, Serbia and Ukraine, compared on MVP offer, timeline and pricing.
Source: https://easifytechnologies.com/mvp-development-companies-central-eastern-europe/
MVP Development Companies in Central and Eastern Europe Compared
20 October 2026 19 min read
If you are looking for an MVP development company in Central or Eastern Europe, the thirteen agencies below, plus Easify, are a factual starting shortlist: each one says on its own website that it builds MVPs or early products for startups, and each is based in Poland, Hungary, Estonia, Austria, Bulgaria, Romania, Serbia or Ukraine. Only four publish an MVP price. This is Easify's own list, Easify is on it, and the entries are in alphabetical order, not ranked.
Facts checked October 2026, on each company's own website. We have left out ratings and review counts, because we could not check them directly, and adjectives we could not back up. Anything an agency says about itself is reported as its own claim.
Work with us
Comparing MVP agencies and want a written scope to compare them with?
Start a conversation ↗ MVP Development
At a glance
Companies listed
14, including Easify
Countries
Poland (4), Hungary (3), Estonia (2), Austria, Bulgaria, Romania, Serbia, Ukraine
Order
Alphabetical, not a ranking
Publish an MVP price
SoftKraft ($5k / $15k / $30k packages), Uptech ($35k–50k), Wavect (€25k–50k typical), Easify (€4k–25k)
Published MVP timelines
From 1–2 weeks to 2–6 months, depending on the agency and the package
Credit paid discovery against the build
Wavect (€3,500), Easify (€900)
Source of every fact
The agency's own website, linked in each entry
Checked
October 2026
How this list was built
- Who is in it. An agency is listed only if its own website offers MVP development, either on an MVP service page or in an explicit MVP offer, and its headquarters or registered seat is in Central or Eastern Europe.
- What we recorded. The same seven fields for everyone: location, founding year, what it offers for MVPs, published timeline, published pricing, public work and a link. Where a site does not state a field, the entry says so.
- What we left out. Ratings, review counts and award badges, including those on directories such as Clutch, GoodFirms and DesignRush. Most of the "top MVP companies in Eastern Europe" pages that rank for this search are written by one of the agencies they rank, and usually put the author first. We would rather give you fields you can check in a minute.
- What it is not. A ranking or a recommendation. A shortlist of fourteen still needs the questions in "How to choose" below.
The comparison table
Agency
City
Focus for MVPs
Published timeline
Published pricing
Link
42 Coffee Cups
Tallinn, Estonia
MVP in 90 days, vibe-code cleanup
13 weeks
Not published
Attrecto
Budapest and Győr, Hungary
MVP and proof of concept
Not published
Not published
Boldare
Gliwice, Poland
MVP after discovery workshops
4–8 weeks
Not published
Cleveroad
Tallinn, Estonia
MVP design, build and launch
Not published
Not published
Dreamix
Sofia, Bulgaria
Six-step MVP process, three engagement models
2–6 months
Not published
Easify Technologies
Budapest, Hungary
Web MVPs, fixed after a written scope
4–12 weeks
€4k–25k; €25–45/hour
Monterail
Wrocław, Poland
MVPs it then keeps building
Not published
Not published
Netguru
Poznań, Poland
MVP within 12 weeks
Up to 12 weeks
Not published
Notix
Belgrade, Serbia
Prototype first, then a production MVP
About 6 weeks
Not published
SoftKraft
Bielsko-Biała, Poland
Fixed-price MVP packages on a boilerplate
1–2 to 7–10 weeks
$5k / $15k / $30k
Uptech
Kyiv, Ukraine (and other offices)
MVPs for iOS and Android
4–5 months
$35k–50k; $40–60/hour
UX studio
Budapest, Hungary
Design-led MVPs it also builds
Not published
Not published
Wavect
Ampass (Tyrol), Austria
Fixed-price MVP after paid discovery
2–3 weeks discovery, then the build
€3,500 discovery; €25k–50k typical
Wolfpack Digital
Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Mobile and web apps, MVPs
2–4 weeks
Not published
The companies, in alphabetical order
42 Coffee Cups
- Location: Tallinn, Estonia (42 Coffee Cups OÜ), with a US entity, Issues Done LLC, in Atlanta
- Founded: the homepage says "since 2007"
- For MVPs: its MVP page promises to "Launch Your MVP in 90 Days" and sets out a 13-week plan, from discovery in weeks 1 and 2 to launch preparation in week 13. A separate "Vibe Code Cleanup" service, listed on its homepage, offers to turn a rapidly built MVP into a stable, maintainable application.
- Pricing: not published
- Public work: MVP case studies for Aidvize, WriteMeSpecs, Cubed and Aktinora AI
- Link: 42coffeecups.com/services/mvp-development
Attrecto
- Location: offices in Budapest and Győr, Hungary, per its contact page
- Founded: not stated; the homepage says "15+ years' experience"
- For MVPs: lists MVP development and proof of concept under pre-development and consulting, for "testing your concept with real users and real feedback"
- Pricing: not published
- Public work: client logos on the homepage include E.ON, Telenor Group and Erste Bank; MVP-specific work is not named
- Link: attrecto.com/services
Boldare
- Location: registered seat in Gliwice, Poland, with offices in Warsaw, Wrocław and Kraków
- Founded: not stated
- For MVPs: product discovery workshops, then a working piece of code each sprint, with a stated time to market of 4 to 8 weeks. It says it has released over 80 MVPs, and that it gives two proposals, covering solution and pricing, per project.
- Pricing: not published
- Public work: case studies for sonnen, Polco and a Virgin Radio Oman MVP
- Link: boldare.com/services/mvp-development
Cleveroad
- Location: lists offices in Tallinn, Estonia; Claymont, Delaware; and Oslo, Norway
- Founded: 2011; its homepage says it has been helping clients "since 2011"
- For MVPs: to "design, develop, and launch a product with just enough features for early users", in five stages from discovery to continuous development. No timeline is given.
- Pricing: not published. The FAQ quotes general market hourly rates, which are not Cleveroad's own.
- Public work: a named testimonial from Betabox; MVP case studies are marked as under NDA
- Link: cleveroad.com/mvp-development-services
Dreamix
- Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
- Founded: not stated; the homepage claims "20+ years of experience", and its copyright line runs from 2006
- For MVPs: a dedicated MVP page with six steps (discovery, design and prototyping, agile development, testing, launch and support) and three engagement models: end-to-end, a dedicated team, or consulting. Its FAQ says an MVP "can be developed within 2-6 months", depending on complexity.
- Pricing: not published
- Public work: a homepage case study of an MVP for ESG360°, delivered in five months per its title; the MVP page also names Plotaverse and CloudCar
- Link: dreamix.eu/services/mvp-development-company
Easify Technologies
- Location: Budapest, Hungary. The people you talk to are in Budapest and work on CET, in English or Hungarian. The engineering team is in India, and invoices are in euros from Easify's registered entity in India.
- For MVPs: a typical MVP takes 4 to 12 weeks and is fixed in price after a written scope. Products are hosted in the EU. Before a build, the €900 MVP Scoping Sprint (about two weeks, fixed price) produces that written scope: the question the MVP answers, the smallest feature set, what is left out, the main flows, the hosting plan, and a fixed price and timeline. The €900 is credited in full against the build if you build with Easify, and you keep the scope whatever you decide. For apps already built with Lovable, Bolt or similar tools, there is a €99 Prototype Check, also credited against the build.
- Pricing: published. MVPs are typically €4,000 to €25,000, at €25 to €45 an hour, with a €1,000 minimum project.
- Public work: the booking MVP that Nonstop Nanny, a Budapest babysitting platform, launched with, and the MVP of Easify AI, a database-querying SaaS that is Easify's own product
- Link: MVP development
This is our list, so read our entry the way you read the others: as facts to check, not a recommendation. In particular, our engineers are not in the EU.
Monterail
- Location: Wrocław, Poland, with offices in Chicago and Berlin
- Founded: 2010; the homepage says "Since 2010"
- For MVPs: no MVP service page; its homepage says it "launched the company's MVP in 2018" for Seat Unique, a premium ticketing company, and has kept building that platform since
- Pricing: not published
- Public work: case studies for Seat Unique, Flink and Merck; Bosch appears as a logo
- Link: monterail.com
Netguru
- Location: Poznań, Poland
- Founded: not stated; the site says "18+" years on the market and 400+ people
- For MVPs: "Launch your MVP within 12 weeks", from idea to launch, with stacks including React, Flutter, React Native, Firebase and Webflow. Quotes are customised.
- Pricing: not published
- Public work: a mobile MVP for Prospero.AI delivered in five weeks, per the case study, and an MVP built from scratch for Moove
- Link: netguru.com/services/mvp-development
Notix
- Location: Belgrade, Serbia (NOTIX DOO), with a US entity, NOTIX LLC, in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Serbia is not an EU member state.
- Founded: not stated; its copyright line runs from 2020
- For MVPs: no separate MVP service page, but the homepage makes an explicit offer: a prototype "lands in 48 hours", and "the same team carries it to a production MVP in about 6 weeks". The first consultation, 30 minutes, is free.
- Pricing: not published
- Public work: case studies for Arhivix, its own product, and MaxPlayer
- Link: notixit.net
SoftKraft
- Location: Bielsko-Biała, Poland
- Founded: not stated; its copyright line runs from 2016
- For MVPs: "a scoped MVP on a production boilerplate", meaning pre-built modules it reuses so the build starts from working code. The process runs from your needs, through an analysis workshop and a written proposal with cost and timeline, to a kick-off and sprints. It says it holds ISO 27001 certification.
- Pricing: published, as three packages priced by the number of core user journeys: Small, $5,000 for 1 to 2 journeys in 1 to 2 weeks; Medium, $15,000 for 3 to 4 journeys in 3 to 5 weeks; Large, $30,000 for 5 to 6 journeys in 7 to 10 weeks. A solution architect and a project specification are included from Medium up.
- Public work: an MVP case study for a workforce training SaaS platform, plus case studies for an emissions-analysis SaaS and a ship data platform; client names are not given with them
- Link: softkraft.co/mvp-development-for-startups
Uptech
- Location: offices in Kyiv, Gdańsk, Tallinn and Los Angeles, with Paphos listed in its menu; its homepage gives Los Angeles as the headquarters
- Founded: not stated; the copyright line runs from 2016
- For MVPs: consulting and strategy, product discovery, prototyping and design, the build, testing, and launch and post-launch support. The build names Android and iOS; web apps are a separate service.
- Pricing: published in its FAQ: MVPs "generally" cost $35,000 to $50,000 and take 4 to 5 months, at $40 to $60 an hour
- Public work: MVP cases for Plai, EaTable and Cardless on the MVP page; logos include GOAT, Aspiration and Dollar Shave Club
- Link: services.uptech.team
UX studio
- Location: Budapest, Hungary (headquarters)
- Founded: not stated
- For MVPs: design-led. Its development page says that most often it builds "new digital products and MVPs", and that "We only develop products that we designed." The first discovery call, about 30 minutes, is free.
- Pricing: not published; the homepage says a proposal includes "a fixed price or rate card"
- Public work: case studies for Inquisita, Oversee AI and Revolution Robotics, and its own products UXfolio, Copyfolio and Archifolio
- Link: uxstudioteam.com/development
Wavect
- Location: Ampass, Tyrol, Austria (Wavect GmbH), per its imprint
- Founded: not stated in the page text; it says it has shipped 75+ products since 2018
- For MVPs: a fixed discovery of 2 to 3 weeks, then a build under what its page calls a Werkvertrag, with the price legally bound to the scope and one reviewable increment each week
- Pricing: published. Discovery and roadmap is €3,500, deducted from the build if you continue. A cross-platform app with login, a core flow and one paid feature "typically lands at €25-50k". AI MVPs are priced separately, from €5,000 to over €100,000 depending on the tier.
- Public work: Twinsoft AI, a sellable MVP in two weeks per the case study, and PromptID, from zero to production in six weeks
- Link: wavect.io/services/mvp-development
Wolfpack Digital
- Location: Cluj-Napoca, Romania (headquarters), with a second address in Dublin
- Founded: not stated
- For MVPs: mobile and web development from discovery onwards. Its FAQ says an MVP "ranges from 2 to 4 weeks" and that a detailed estimate takes 2 to 3 working days.
- Pricing: not published; its pricing page lists cost factors but no figures
- Public work: partner logos include Deezer and Sephora
- Link: wolfpack-digital.com/services
The published prices, side by side
Four agencies publish a figure. They are not the same kind of number, so here is what each one says it buys.
Agency
Price
What the agency says it covers
Timeline it gives
SoftKraft
$5,000
1–2 core user journeys
1–2 weeks
SoftKraft
$15,000
3–4 core user journeys, solution architect, high-level specification
3–5 weeks
SoftKraft
$30,000
5–6 core user journeys, solution architect, detailed specification
7–10 weeks
Easify
€4,000–25,000
A typical MVP, fixed after a written scope
4–12 weeks
Wavect
€3,500
Discovery and roadmap, deducted from the build
2–3 weeks
Wavect
€25,000–50,000
A cross-platform app with login, a core flow and one paid feature
Not stated
Uptech
$35,000–50,000
A typical MVP, at $40–60 an hour
4–5 months
Three things to read from it:
- Currencies differ. Two agencies price in dollars and two in euros. Convert at the day's rate before you compare, and ask which currency the invoice will be in.
- Units differ. SoftKraft prices by user journey, Wavect by a described product, and Uptech and Easify by a typical range. Count your own core journeys (sign up, do the main task, pay, and so on) and you can place your MVP on each scale.
- Ranges are not quotes. Every one of these is the agency's own typical figure. The price you get depends on your scope.
Which entries to read first
This maps what you need to the entries whose own websites speak to it. It is not a ranking within each row.
If you need
Read first
Why, from their own sites
A fixed price before you commit
SoftKraft, Wavect, Easify
Fixed packages, or a price fixed after paid discovery or a written scope
A price range in the first call
SoftKraft, Uptech, Wavect, Easify
The only four that publish one
To fix an app built with an AI tool
42 Coffee Cups, Easify
A vibe-code cleanup service, and the €99 Prototype Check
Design and research first
UX studio
Only builds products it designed
A native mobile app
Uptech, Wolfpack Digital
The build names iOS and Android, or leads with mobile
Something live very fast
SoftKraft, Wolfpack Digital, Notix
Published timelines of 1–2 weeks, 2–4 weeks and about 6 weeks
A team that keeps building after launch
Monterail, Dreamix
A named MVP still built on years later, and a support step after launch
A build price bound to the scope in the contract
Wavect
A Werkvertrag with the price legally bound to scope
How to choose from this list
Whoever you hire, the published facts above only get you to a shortlist. Use them like this.
- Write down what the MVP must prove before you contact anyone. One sentence: the question, and the result that would change your plans. Every agency will give a better quote against that sentence than against a feature list.
- Treat timelines as a description of scope, not speed. The published figures here run from 1 to 2 weeks to 2 to 6 months. The agencies are not working at wildly different speeds; they mean different things by "MVP". Ask each one what is inside its typical timeline.
- Ask the agencies that publish no price for a range. Most here quote per project, which is reasonable, but a range in the first call tells you whether to continue. Compare the published ones carefully, using the table above. Our own view of the market is in what an MVP costs in Europe, and the MVP cost calculator gives a rough figure for your own feature list.
- Ask where the engineers are, not only where the office is. Several companies here work across more than one country, Easify included. Ask who you would talk to every week, in what language and time zone, and who writes the code.
- Ask whether discovery is paid, and whether it is credited. Wavect and Easify both credit paid discovery against the build: Wavect's €3,500 is deducted if you continue, and Easify's €900 Scoping Sprint is credited in full if you build with Easify. Others run free calls or workshops. A paid discovery is fine if the written output is yours to take elsewhere. Check that before you pay.
- Check who owns the code and accounts, and when. Repositories, hosting, domains and design files should be in your name, or transferred on final payment, in writing.
- Ask to see work like yours. A named MVP case study, ideally with a client you can speak to, is worth more than a logo wall. Several entries above show logos of large companies whose work may not have been an MVP.
- Consider whether you need an agency at all. For a narrow build you can manage yourself, a freelancer or a no-code tool may be enough; see agency vs freelancer vs no-code.
For the full set of questions to put to each agency, with example answers and red flags, read how to choose an MVP development agency.
Hiring across borders: contract, invoice and VAT
Every agency here may be in a different country from you. Three things to settle in writing:
- Which law the contract sits under. Do not assume it. Ask for the governing law and the place of disputes in the first draft, not the last, and check how the contract ties the price to the scope. Wavect, for example, says its build price is legally bound to scope under a Werkvertrag.
- Who issues the invoice, and from where. The office you meet and the entity that bills you can differ. Several agencies here list a US entity or office alongside their European one, and Easify invoices in euros from its entity in India.
- How VAT works for you. For business buyers, the EU's Your Europe guidance on cross-border VAT says a supplier in another EU country does not usually charge you VAT on services; you pay it in your own country under the reverse charge. It says the same reverse charge usually applies to services bought from outside the EU, and that there are several important exceptions. Serbia and Ukraine are outside the EU, so confirm the treatment with your accountant before you sign.
If you are paying for the MVP partly with a grant or a public programme, check the programme's rules on foreign suppliers first. MVP grants and funding in Europe covers how founders fund this, and there are guides for Poland and Hungary.
A brief to send to your shortlist
Send the same brief to every agency, so the replies answer the same question. Copy this and fill it in:
- What the MVP must prove: one sentence, for example "that clinic managers will book cover shifts through an app instead of by phone".
- First users: who they are, how many you expect in the first three months, and how you will reach them.
- Core user journeys: three to five things a user must be able to do, each one line. This is also the unit SoftKraft prices by.
- Out of scope for now: the features you are deliberately leaving out.
- Platform: web, iOS, Android, or a mix, and why.
- Integrations: payments, email, maps, calendars, an existing system or an AI model.
- Data and compliance: what personal data you hold, and where it must be hosted.
- Budget range and launch date: a real range, and the date that matters to you.
- What you want back: a price, a timeline, the team, who owns the code, and what happens after launch.
A sheet for comparing the replies
Put each reply into the same columns. A blank cell is itself an answer.
Field
Agency A
Agency B
Agency C
Price, and fixed or estimated
Currency, and the entity that invoices
Timeline to a usable first version
Journeys included, and what is left out
Discovery: paid or free, credited or not
Who you talk to weekly, and in which time zone
Where the engineers are
Code, hosting and accounts in your name from when
Governing law of the contract
A named MVP like yours you can check
Support and changes after launch, and their cost
Common mistakes when comparing these agencies
- Comparing headline prices. $5,000 for two user journeys and €25,000 for a cross-platform app with payments are not two prices for the same thing.
- Picking the shortest published timeline. A 2-week MVP and a 5-month MVP are different products. Ask for the feature list behind each timeline.
- Reading a logo wall as MVP experience. Ask which named work was an MVP, and for a client you can contact.
- Skipping the question of where the code is written. The city in the table is where the agency is based. It is not necessarily where your engineers sit.
- Paying for discovery without owning the output. Two agencies here credit their paid discovery against the build. Whether or not it is credited, the written scope should be yours to take elsewhere.
- Leaving ownership and law to the final contract. Raise code ownership, account ownership and governing law in the first call.
When Easify is not the right pick from this list
- You want the engineers in the EU. Our client team is in Budapest, but our engineering team is in India. Products are hosted in the EU, but if you need the people writing the code inside the EU, choose an agency that can show you that.
- You want a design-led studio first. If research and UX are the main risk, a studio that leads with design, such as UX studio, may suit you better.
- Your MVP is a large native mobile app. Several agencies here lead with iOS and Android work. Our published MVP case studies are web platforms.
- Your budget is above our MVP band. We typically build MVPs for €4,000 to €25,000. A larger first build may suit an agency whose published range starts higher.
- Your budget is under €1,000. That is our minimum project.
If you are in Hungary or nearby and want to compare more local options, see MVP development in Hungary.
Work with us
Comparing MVP agencies and want a written scope to compare them with?
We are a Budapest team that builds MVPs for founders across Europe, typically €4,000 to €25,000 over four to twelve weeks, fixed after a written scope. Send us a few lines on what you want to test and who it is for, or ask for the €900 MVP Scoping Sprint, credited in full against the build if you build with us, and we reply within one business day.
Start a conversation ↗ MVP Development
Recent builds
[
Nonstop Nanny · Childcare
Web MVP and SEO for a Babysitter Booking Platform
MVP
SEO
WordPress
WooCommerce
[
Easify AI · SaaS & AI
AI MVP Development for a Database Querying SaaS
MVP
WordPress
React
On this page
- At a glance
- How this list was built
- The comparison table
- The companies, in alphabetical order
- 42 Coffee Cups
- Attrecto
- Boldare
- Cleveroad
- Dreamix
- Easify Technologies
- Monterail
- Netguru
- Notix
- SoftKraft
- Uptech
- UX studio
- Wavect
- Wolfpack Digital
- The published prices, side by side
- Which entries to read first
- How to choose from this list
- Hiring across borders: contract, invoice and VAT
- A brief to send to your shortlist
- A sheet for comparing the replies
- Common mistakes when comparing these agencies
- When Easify is not the right pick from this list
Frequently asked
Which countries in Central and Eastern Europe have MVP development companies?
Most of them. This list covers agencies based in Poland, Hungary, Estonia, Austria, Bulgaria, Romania, Serbia and Ukraine, and there are others in Czechia, Croatia, Slovakia, Lithuania and Latvia. Where the agency is registered matters less than where the people you talk to are, and where the engineers are.
How much does an MVP cost with a Central or Eastern European agency?
Few agencies publish a figure. Of the fourteen here, four do: SoftKraft sells packages at $5,000, $15,000 and $30,000, Uptech says $35,000 to $50,000, Wavect says a typical cross-platform MVP lands at €25,000 to €50,000, and Easify says €4,000 to €25,000. The rest quote per project. Compare what each scope contains, not only the number.
How long does an MVP take with these agencies?
The published timelines run from 1 to 2 weeks (SoftKraft's smallest package) to 2 to 6 months (Dreamix). In between are 2 to 4 weeks (Wolfpack Digital), 4 to 8 weeks (Boldare), about 6 weeks (Notix), up to 12 weeks (Netguru), 13 weeks (42 Coffee Cups), 4 to 12 weeks (Easify) and 4 to 5 months (Uptech). They describe different sizes of product, so ask what each one includes before you compare them.
Which of these agencies publish a fixed MVP price?
SoftKraft publishes three fixed packages, priced by the number of core user journeys. Wavect publishes a fixed €3,500 discovery and then fixes the build price after it. Easify publishes a range and fixes the price after a written scope. Uptech publishes a general range. The others quote per project.
Do any of these agencies credit paid discovery against the build?
Two say so on their own sites. Wavect deducts its €3,500 discovery from the build if you continue, and Easify credits its €900 MVP Scoping Sprint in full against the build if you build with Easify. Others run free calls or workshops. Whichever you choose, check that the written output is yours to keep.
Is it safe to hire an MVP agency in another country?
Yes, as long as the contract is clear on scope, price, payment milestones, who owns the code and which country's law applies. Serbia and Ukraine are outside the EU, and several agencies here have entities or engineers outside the EU, Easify included, so ask where the contract, the invoice and the engineers are.
What should I send an agency to get a quote I can compare?
One sentence on what the MVP must prove, who the first users are, the three to five things they must be able to do, what is out of scope, your budget range and your launch date. Send the same brief to every agency on your shortlist, so the replies answer the same question.
Why is Easify on its own list?
Because this is Easify's list and Easify builds MVPs, so leaving it out would be odd and putting it first would be unfair. It is listed alphabetically with the same fact fields as everyone else, so you can check it the same way.
Keep reading
[
Edtech MVP Development: Buyers, Children's Data and Scope
[
Enterprise Ireland Funding for Startups Building an MVP
](https://easifytechnologies.com/enterprise-ireland-funding-for-startups/)
[
EU Funding for Startups: Can It Pay for Your MVP?
](https://easifytechnologies.com/eu-funding-for-startups-mvp/)
Want this done properly on your own site?