MVP Development Companies in Central and Eastern Europe Compared

If you are looking for an MVP development company in Central or Eastern Europe, the thirteen agencies below, plus Easify, are a factual starting shortlist: each one says on its own website that it builds MVPs or early products for startups, and each is based in Poland, Hungary, Estonia, Austria, Bulgaria, Romania, Serbia or Ukraine. Only four publish an MVP price. This is Easify's own list, Easify is on it, and the entries are in alphabetical order, not ranked.

Facts checked October 2026, on each company's own website. We have left out ratings and review counts, because we could not check them directly, and adjectives we could not back up. Anything an agency says about itself is reported as its own claim.

At a glance

How this list was built

• Who is in it. An agency is listed only if its own website offers MVP development, either on an MVP service page or in an explicit MVP offer, and its headquarters or registered seat is in Central or Eastern Europe.
• What we recorded. The same seven fields for everyone: location, founding year, what it offers for MVPs, published timeline, published pricing, public work and a link. Where a site does not state a field, the entry says so.
• What we left out. Ratings, review counts and award badges, including those on directories such as Clutch, GoodFirms and DesignRush. Most of the "top MVP companies in Eastern Europe" pages that rank for this search are written by one of the agencies they rank, and usually put the author first. We would rather give you fields you can check in a minute.
• What it is not. A ranking or a recommendation. A shortlist of fourteen still needs the questions in "How to choose" below.

The comparison table

The companies, in alphabetical order

42 Coffee Cups

• Location: Tallinn, Estonia (42 Coffee Cups OÜ), with a US entity, Issues Done LLC, in Atlanta
• Founded: the homepage says "since 2007"
• For MVPs: its MVP page promises to "Launch Your MVP in 90 Days" and sets out a 13-week plan, from discovery in weeks 1 and 2 to launch preparation in week 13. A separate "Vibe Code Cleanup" service, listed on its homepage, offers to turn a rapidly built MVP into a stable, maintainable application.
• Pricing: not published
• Public work: MVP case studies for Aidvize, WriteMeSpecs, Cubed and Aktinora AI
• Link: 42coffeecups.com/services/mvp-development

Attrecto

• Location: offices in Budapest and Győr, Hungary, per its contact page
• Founded: not stated; the homepage says "15+ years' experience"
• For MVPs: lists MVP development and proof of concept under pre-development and consulting, for "testing your concept with real users and real feedback"
• Pricing: not published
• Public work: client logos on the homepage include E.ON, Telenor Group and Erste Bank; MVP-specific work is not named
• Link: attrecto.com/services

Boldare

• Location: registered seat in Gliwice, Poland, with offices in Warsaw, Wrocław and Kraków
• Founded: not stated
• For MVPs: product discovery workshops, then a working piece of code each sprint, with a stated time to market of 4 to 8 weeks. It says it has released over 80 MVPs, and that it gives two proposals, covering solution and pricing, per project.
• Pricing: not published
• Public work: case studies for sonnen, Polco and a Virgin Radio Oman MVP
• Link: boldare.com/services/mvp-development

Cleveroad

• Location: lists offices in Tallinn, Estonia; Claymont, Delaware; and Oslo, Norway
• Founded: 2011; its homepage says it has been helping clients "since 2011"
• For MVPs: to "design, develop, and launch a product with just enough features for early users", in five stages from discovery to continuous development. No timeline is given.
• Pricing: not published. The FAQ quotes general market hourly rates, which are not Cleveroad's own.
• Public work: a named testimonial from Betabox; MVP case studies are marked as under NDA
• Link: cleveroad.com/mvp-development-services

Dreamix

• Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
• Founded: not stated; the homepage claims "20+ years of experience", and its copyright line runs from 2006
• For MVPs: a dedicated MVP page with six steps (discovery, design and prototyping, agile development, testing, launch and support) and three engagement models: end-to-end, a dedicated team, or consulting. Its FAQ says an MVP "can be developed within 2-6 months", depending on complexity.
• Pricing: not published
• Public work: a homepage case study of an MVP for ESG360°, delivered in five months per its title; the MVP page also names Plotaverse and CloudCar
• Link: dreamix.eu/services/mvp-development-company

Easify Technologies

• Location: Budapest, Hungary. The people you talk to are in Budapest and work on CET, in English or Hungarian. The engineering team is in India, and invoices are in euros from Easify's registered entity in India.
• For MVPs: a typical MVP takes 4 to 12 weeks and is fixed in price after a written scope. Products are hosted in the EU. Before a build, the €900 MVP Scoping Sprint (about two weeks, fixed price) produces that written scope: the question the MVP answers, the smallest feature set, what is left out, the main flows, the hosting plan, and a fixed price and timeline. The €900 is credited in full against the build if you build with Easify, and you keep the scope whatever you decide. For apps already built with Lovable, Bolt or similar tools, there is a €99 Prototype Check, also credited against the build.
• Pricing: published. MVPs are typically €5,000 to €25,000, at €25 to €45 an hour, with a €1,000 minimum project.
• Public work: the booking MVP that Nonstop Nanny, a Budapest babysitting platform, launched with, and the MVP of Easify AI, a database-querying SaaS that is Easify's own product
• Link: MVP development

This is our list, so read our entry the way you read the others: as facts to check, not a recommendation. In particular, our engineers are not in the EU.

Monterail

• Location: Wrocław, Poland, with offices in Chicago and Berlin
• Founded: 2010; the homepage says "Since 2010"
• For MVPs: no MVP service page; its homepage says it "launched the company's MVP in 2018" for Seat Unique, a premium ticketing company, and has kept building that platform since
• Pricing: not published
• Public work: case studies for Seat Unique, Flink and Merck; Bosch appears as a logo
• Link: monterail.com

Netguru

• Location: Poznań, Poland
• Founded: not stated; the site says "18+" years on the market and 400+ people
• For MVPs: "Launch your MVP within 12 weeks", from idea to launch, with stacks including React, Flutter, React Native, Firebase and Webflow. Quotes are customised.
• Pricing: not published
• Public work: a mobile MVP for Prospero.AI delivered in five weeks, per the case study, and an MVP built from scratch for Moove
• Link: netguru.com/services/mvp-development

Notix

• Location: Belgrade, Serbia (NOTIX DOO), with a US entity, NOTIX LLC, in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Serbia is not an EU member state.
• Founded: not stated; its copyright line runs from 2020
• For MVPs: no separate MVP service page, but the homepage makes an explicit offer: a prototype "lands in 48 hours", and "the same team carries it to a production MVP in about 6 weeks". The first consultation, 30 minutes, is free.
• Pricing: not published
• Public work: case studies for Arhivix, its own product, and MaxPlayer
• Link: notixit.net

SoftKraft

• Location: Bielsko-Biała, Poland
• Founded: not stated; its copyright line runs from 2016
• For MVPs: "a scoped MVP on a production boilerplate", meaning pre-built modules it reuses so the build starts from working code. The process runs from your needs, through an analysis workshop and a written proposal with cost and timeline, to a kick-off and sprints. It says it holds ISO 27001 certification.
• Pricing: published, as three packages priced by the number of core user journeys: Small, $5,000 for 1 to 2 journeys in 1 to 2 weeks; Medium, $15,000 for 3 to 4 journeys in 3 to 5 weeks; Large, $30,000 for 5 to 6 journeys in 7 to 10 weeks. A solution architect and a project specification are included from Medium up.
• Public work: an MVP case study for a workforce training SaaS platform, plus case studies for an emissions-analysis SaaS and a ship data platform; client names are not given with them
• Link: softkraft.co/mvp-development-for-startups

Uptech

• Location: offices in Kyiv, Gdańsk, Tallinn and Los Angeles, with Paphos listed in its menu; its homepage gives Los Angeles as the headquarters
• Founded: not stated; the copyright line runs from 2016
• For MVPs: consulting and strategy, product discovery, prototyping and design, the build, testing, and launch and post-launch support. The build names Android and iOS; web apps are a separate service.
• Pricing: published in its FAQ: MVPs "generally" cost $35,000 to $50,000 and take 4 to 5 months, at $40 to $60 an hour
• Public work: MVP cases for Plai, EaTable and Cardless on the MVP page; logos include GOAT, Aspiration and Dollar Shave Club
• Link: services.uptech.team

UX studio

• Location: Budapest, Hungary (headquarters)
• Founded: not stated
• For MVPs: design-led. Its development page says that most often it builds "new digital products and MVPs", and that "We only develop products that we designed." The first discovery call, about 30 minutes, is free.
• Pricing: not published; the homepage says a proposal includes "a fixed price or rate card"
• Public work: case studies for Inquisita, Oversee AI and Revolution Robotics, and its own products UXfolio, Copyfolio and Archifolio
• Link: uxstudioteam.com/development

Wavect

• Location: Ampass, Tyrol, Austria (Wavect GmbH), per its imprint
• Founded: not stated in the page text; it says it has shipped 75+ products since 2018
• For MVPs: a fixed discovery of 2 to 3 weeks, then a build under what its page calls a Werkvertrag, with the price legally bound to the scope and one reviewable increment each week
• Pricing: published. Discovery and roadmap is €3,500, deducted from the build if you continue. A cross-platform app with login, a core flow and one paid feature "typically lands at €25-50k". AI MVPs are priced separately, from €5,000 to over €100,000 depending on the tier.
• Public work: Twinsoft AI, a sellable MVP in two weeks per the case study, and PromptID, from zero to production in six weeks
• Link: wavect.io/services/mvp-development

Wolfpack Digital

• Location: Cluj-Napoca, Romania (headquarters), with a second address in Dublin
• Founded: not stated
• For MVPs: mobile and web development from discovery onwards. Its FAQ says an MVP "ranges from 2 to 4 weeks" and that a detailed estimate takes 2 to 3 working days.
• Pricing: not published; its pricing page lists cost factors but no figures
• Public work: partner logos include Deezer and Sephora
• Link: wolfpack-digital.com/services

The published prices, side by side

Four agencies publish a figure. They are not the same kind of number, so here is what each one says it buys.

Three things to read from it:

• Currencies differ. Two agencies price in dollars and two in euros. Convert at the day's rate before you compare, and ask which currency the invoice will be in.
• Units differ. SoftKraft prices by user journey, Wavect by a described product, and Uptech and Easify by a typical range. Count your own core journeys (sign up, do the main task, pay, and so on) and you can place your MVP on each scale.
• Ranges are not quotes. Every one of these is the agency's own typical figure. The price you get depends on your scope.

Which entries to read first

This maps what you need to the entries whose own websites speak to it. It is not a ranking within each row.

How to choose from this list

Whoever you hire, the published facts above only get you to a shortlist. Use them like this.

1. Write down what the MVP must prove before you contact anyone. One sentence: the question, and the result that would change your plans. Every agency will give a better quote against that sentence than against a feature list.
2. Treat timelines as a description of scope, not speed. The published figures here run from 1 to 2 weeks to 2 to 6 months. The agencies are not working at wildly different speeds; they mean different things by "MVP". Ask each one what is inside its typical timeline.
3. Ask the agencies that publish no price for a range. Most here quote per project, which is reasonable, but a range in the first call tells you whether to continue. Compare the published ones carefully, using the table above. Our own view of the market is in what an MVP costs in Europe, and the MVP cost calculator gives a rough figure for your own feature list.
4. Ask where the engineers are, not only where the office is. Several companies here work across more than one country, Easify included. Ask who you would talk to every week, in what language and time zone, and who writes the code.
5. Ask whether discovery is paid, and whether it is credited. Wavect and Easify both credit paid discovery against the build: Wavect's €3,500 is deducted if you continue, and Easify's €900 Scoping Sprint is credited in full if you build with Easify. Others run free calls or workshops. A paid discovery is fine if the written output is yours to take elsewhere. Check that before you pay.
6. Check who owns the code and accounts, and when. Repositories, hosting, domains and design files should be in your name, or transferred on final payment, in writing.
7. Ask to see work like yours. A named MVP case study, ideally with a client you can speak to, is worth more than a logo wall. Several entries above show logos of large companies whose work may not have been an MVP.
8. Consider whether you need an agency at all. For a narrow build you can manage yourself, a freelancer or a no-code tool may be enough; see agency vs freelancer vs no-code.

For the full set of questions to put to each agency, with example answers and red flags, read how to choose an MVP development agency.

Hiring across borders: contract, invoice and VAT

Every agency here may be in a different country from you. Three things to settle in writing:

• Which law the contract sits under. Do not assume it. Ask for the governing law and the place of disputes in the first draft, not the last, and check how the contract ties the price to the scope. Wavect, for example, says its build price is legally bound to scope under a Werkvertrag.
• Who issues the invoice, and from where. The office you meet and the entity that bills you can differ. Several agencies here list a US entity or office alongside their European one, and Easify invoices in euros from its entity in India.
• How VAT works for you. For business buyers, the EU's Your Europe guidance on cross-border VAT says a supplier in another EU country does not usually charge you VAT on services; you pay it in your own country under the reverse charge. It says the same reverse charge usually applies to services bought from outside the EU, and that there are several important exceptions. Serbia and Ukraine are outside the EU, so confirm the treatment with your accountant before you sign.

If you are paying for the MVP partly with a grant or a public programme, check the programme's rules on foreign suppliers first. MVP grants and funding in Europe covers how founders fund this, and there are guides for Poland and Hungary.

A brief to send to your shortlist

Send the same brief to every agency, so the replies answer the same question. Copy this and fill it in:

1. What the MVP must prove: one sentence, for example "that clinic managers will book cover shifts through an app instead of by phone".
2. First users: who they are, how many you expect in the first three months, and how you will reach them.
3. Core user journeys: three to five things a user must be able to do, each one line. This is also the unit SoftKraft prices by.
4. Out of scope for now: the features you are deliberately leaving out.
5. Platform: web, iOS, Android, or a mix, and why.
6. Integrations: payments, email, maps, calendars, an existing system or an AI model.
7. Data and compliance: what personal data you hold, and where it must be hosted.
8. Budget range and launch date: a real range, and the date that matters to you.
9. What you want back: a price, a timeline, the team, who owns the code, and what happens after launch.

A sheet for comparing the replies

Put each reply into the same columns. A blank cell is itself an answer.

Common mistakes when comparing these agencies

• Comparing headline prices. $5,000 for two user journeys and €25,000 for a cross-platform app with payments are not two prices for the same thing.
• Picking the shortest published timeline. A 2-week MVP and a 5-month MVP are different products. Ask for the feature list behind each timeline.
• Reading a logo wall as MVP experience. Ask which named work was an MVP, and for a client you can contact.
• Skipping the question of where the code is written. The city in the table is where the agency is based. It is not necessarily where your engineers sit.
• Paying for discovery without owning the output. Two agencies here credit their paid discovery against the build. Whether or not it is credited, the written scope should be yours to take elsewhere.
• Leaving ownership and law to the final contract. Raise code ownership, account ownership and governing law in the first call.

When Easify is not the right pick from this list

• You want the engineers in the EU. Our client team is in Budapest, but our engineering team is in India. Products are hosted in the EU, but if you need the people writing the code inside the EU, choose an agency that can show you that.
• You want a design-led studio first. If research and UX are the main risk, a studio that leads with design, such as UX studio, may suit you better.
• Your MVP is a large native mobile app. Several agencies here lead with iOS and Android work. Our published MVP case studies are web platforms.
• Your budget is above our MVP band. We typically build MVPs for €5,000 to €25,000. A larger first build may suit an agency whose published range starts higher.
• Your budget is under €1,000. That is our minimum project.

If you are in Hungary or nearby and want to compare more local options, see MVP development in Hungary.